| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Does psql use nested transactions? |
| Date: | 2004-08-17 17:14:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200408171714.i7HHEjR23200@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner wrote:
> At 01:47 AM 12/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> >It might be reasonable to offer that behavior as an option, but I think
> >I'd only want it on for interactive input.
>
> My preference would be for something like:
>
> set savepoint_per_statement=true
>
> then interactive & scripts could choose to use either feature.
Added to TODO list:
* Add an option to automatically use savepoints for each statement in a
multi-statement transaction.
When enabled, this would allow errors in multi-statement transactions
to be automatically ignored.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-17 17:39:40 | Re: Does psql use nested transactions? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-17 17:10:39 | Re: pg_restore (libpq? parser?) bug in 8 |