Re: Does psql use nested transactions?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does psql use nested transactions?
Date: 2004-08-11 15:59:55
Message-ID: 6.1.1.1.0.20040812015726.04f15298@203.8.195.10
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 01:47 AM 12/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>It might be reasonable to offer that behavior as an option, but I think
>I'd only want it on for interactive input.

My preference would be for something like:

set savepoint_per_statement=true

then interactive & scripts could choose to use either feature.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2004-08-11 16:02:59 pg_dump 'die_on_errors'
Previous Message Harald Fuchs 2004-08-11 15:49:22 Re: Add Missing From?