From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
Date: | 2004-08-13 14:14:46 |
Message-ID: | 20040813101404.Q48580@xeon.unixathome.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> > > Every time PostgreSQL is discussed, be that slashdot or LWN or other
> > > forums or even interviews with any of out competitors, the statement is
> > > "doesn't have replication". If we avoid the topic in our 8.0 press
> > > release and leave out the word replication, instead of pointing to the
> > > reasons why it is *better not to have replication builtin*, we will
> > > lose. People will read the press release, don't see the word
> > > replication, so "No Replication - checkmark".
> >
> > Except that "Have Replication" to those claiming 'No Replicatin' means
> > "Integrated with the Server", we still don't *have* Replication in their
> > minds, no matter how many external projects that do it we mention ;(
>
> Both Joshua Drake and Marc sell commercial replication solutions. Do
> you think it is fair of the community to mention BSD-licensed
> replication solutions in our press release while not mentioning
> commercial ones?
>
> I do.
Bruce is not alone here. The community does not exist to promote
commericial solutions.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-08-13 14:26:49 | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-13 14:08:01 | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |