Re: VACUUM DELAY

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM DELAY
Date: 2004-08-09 18:10:54
Message-ID: 20040809181053.GC6509@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 07:19:44PM +0200, Gaetano Mendola wrote:

> So the other parameter will inserted in the new sintax too, I think is
> fundamental
> the ability of override this values during the vacuum call:
>
> VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100 [ .... ];

What's wrong with

SET vacuum_delat 100;
SET whatever_parameter 'value';
VACUUM ...;

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Licensee shall have no right to use the Licensed Software
for productive or commercial use. (Licencia de StarOffice 6.0 beta)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql 2004-08-09 18:18:17 fsync vs open_sync
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-08-09 17:57:52 Re: Beta Leader?