Re: VACUUM DELAY

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: VACUUM DELAY
Date: 2004-08-09 17:19:44
Message-ID: 4117B230.1050307@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:

> On 8/9/2004 7:19 AM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I have seen the big debat about to have the delay
>> off or on by default.
>>
>> Why not enable it by default and introduce a new
>> parameter to vacuum command itself ? Something like:
>>
>>
>> VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100;
>
>
> It's not just one parameter to tune here. It is a set of parameters that
> all together need to be viewed as a whole. The slowdown will be affected
> by the other parameters as well, so turning the millisecond knob only is
> not even half of the story.

So the other parameter will inserted in the new sintax too, I think is fundamental
the ability of override this values during the vacuum call:

VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100 [ .... ];

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2004-08-09 17:23:41 Tablespace issues (comment on ,moving indexes)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-09 17:15:18 Beta Leader?