Re: VACUUM DELAY

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM DELAY
Date: 2004-08-09 19:10:41
Message-ID: 4117CC31.9050308@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

| On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 07:19:44PM +0200, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
|
|
|>So the other parameter will inserted in the new sintax too, I think is
|>fundamental
|>the ability of override this values during the vacuum call:
|>
|>VACUUM .... WITH DELAY 100 [ .... ];
|
|
| What's wrong with
|
| SET vacuum_delat 100;
| SET whatever_parameter 'value';
| VACUUM ...;

Noting wrong but:

1) The parameters and new feature will be spotted out better to new users
2) My shell script will become less hugly :-)

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBF8wv7UpzwH2SGd4RAnSHAJ0QI0Uu9ZVJiMFn3NY5jFT6omdkYwCfZ8pU
BaVnYczZ9pGGTBXMurNtj30=
=hP7Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-09 19:11:09 Re: Beta Leader?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-08-09 19:06:29 Re: Beta Leader?