Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] The pgreplication project

Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 6/8/2004 9:58 AM, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> >> I guess I have to address a slightly broader audience, or do I conclude
> >> from the total lack of interest in this matter that nobody cares if we
> >> promote something here as one of our "top five" flagship projects, that
> >> is inactive for years and still a prototype implementation against
> >> PostgreSQL 6.4 with no ideas how to incorporate the semantic changes of
> >> MVCC into the concept.
> >
> >
> > Jan,
> >
> > Perhaps you should contact the project admin or at least
> > posting to the project mailing list, before assuming the
> > project is dead. Admittedly there has been several
> > delays and periods of inactivity, but declaring a
> > project dead without investigating is quite
> > inappropriate.
>
> I apologize and admit that it should have been posted to the project
> mailing list.

I assumed the top-5 projects are dynamic based on the amount of
activity, not hardcoded as they seem to be.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073