Re: pgFoundry

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry
Date: 2004-03-11 19:38:56
Message-ID: 200403112038.56027.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Josh Berkus wrote:
> The only thing which was not discussed was the domain, which we
> regarded as incidental to the installation, which I already
> mentioned, and I apologize for not figuring out that people would
> have an opinion about it.

That was my point and evidently you were mistaken. If the domain name
were incidental, then we might as well have stuck with gborg, because
that is what many people are used to.

Everybody had agreed to <project>.postgresql.net, and now it's gone
without explanation.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-11 19:55:09 Re: pgFoundry
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-11 19:17:07 Re: Default Stats Revisited

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-11 19:55:09 Re: pgFoundry
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-11 19:14:33 Re: pgFoundry