Re: pgFoundry

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry
Date: 2004-03-11 19:55:09
Message-ID: 200403111155.09851.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Peter,

> Everybody had agreed to <project>.postgresql.net, and now it's gone
> without explanation.

Oh! Well, if that's what you want, why didn't you say so? We can certainly
change things since it's not official yet.

Like I said, I wasn't clear that there was a consensus for the postgresql.net
scheme. Can other people speak up about this?

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-11 20:29:29 Re: pgFoundry
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-03-11 19:38:56 Re: pgFoundry

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-11 20:29:29 Re: pgFoundry
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-03-11 19:38:56 Re: pgFoundry