Re: Default Stats Revisited

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Default Stats Revisited
Date: 2004-03-11 19:17:07
Message-ID: 200403111117.07988.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> Maybe you should ask on -admin or -general. Personally I thought there
> wasn't anything to say until someone did some experiments to show
> whether an indexed-column differential is really worthwhile and what a
> plausible default value would be. The idea sounds good in the abstract,
> but will it really help or just be another useless setting?

Yeah, that's our next step, a test.

On Monday, I hope to have comparative stats for a difficult database on the 3
solutions (leaving things as-is, raising the general default stats, and doing
index_stats).

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-03-11 19:38:56 Re: pgFoundry
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-11 19:14:33 Re: pgFoundry