| From: | Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-02-29 01:35:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200402290235.59924.kar@kakidata.dk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
> Why GForge?
GForge seems to be technically OK. But what about the future outlook. The home
page lists 5 projects, whereof the 4 are tests. Are you sure they will not
fold in a month or two, will they be reliable, responsive and real nice (the
three r's) ?
--
Kaare Rasmussen --Linux, spil,-- Tlf: 3816 2582
Kaki Data tshirts, merchandize Fax: 3816 2501
Howitzvej 75 Åben 12.00-18.00 Email: kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk
2000 Frederiksberg Lørdag 12.00-16.00 Web: www.suse.dk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Larson | 2004-02-29 03:03:33 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-02-28 22:49:23 | Re: Question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-29 02:01:35 | Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-02-29 01:27:45 | Re: log_line_info |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Larson | 2004-02-29 03:03:33 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-02-28 17:05:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Larson | 2004-02-29 03:03:33 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | David Costa | 2004-02-28 23:59:49 | Re: Upgraded Site..any news ? |