Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Tim Larson <tim(at)keow(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-29 03:03:33
Message-ID: 20040229030333.GD24612@keow.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:35:59AM +0100, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> > Why GForge?
>
> GForge seems to be technically OK. But what about the future outlook. The home
> page lists 5 projects, whereof the 4 are tests. Are you sure they will not
> fold in a month or two, will they be reliable, responsive and real nice (the
> three r's) ?

http://gforge.org/ is not a hosting site, that is why you only found 4
test projects and the GForge project itself hosted on the site. The idea
is that you download the software and host it on your own hardware.

--Tim Larson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] 2004-02-29 16:47:18 Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2004-02-29 01:35:59 Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Larson 2004-02-29 03:22:44 Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-29 02:44:58 Re: Enterprice support in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] 2004-02-29 16:47:18 Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2004-02-29 01:35:59 Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2004-02-29 09:57:48 jdbc.postgresql.org still configured to send .jars as text/plain
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2004-02-29 01:35:59 Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal