Re: gforge

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gforge
Date: 2003-12-01 19:40:05
Message-ID: 20031201153842.O38069@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


IMHO ... I would personally love to avoid having to move, for exactly the
reasons that several people of put forth, but largely, migrating projects
from one to the other *would* be a nightmare (doable, but painful) ...

So, if it is/were possible to build up a team to push development of GBorg
forward, that would be teh optimal solution ...

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Chris Ryan wrote:

> With respect to GBorg vs GForge, or any other project hosting site
> infrastructure for that matter, it is my firm belief that you should do
> what is best for the PostgreSQL community. Which is best? I am sure
> everyone will have their own opinions about that along with the merits
> and disadvantages to each choice. If the choice is made to move away
> from GBorg I would fully understand and offer my assistance in any
> migration effort possible to another system.
>
> As for the direct development and maintenance of GBorg I often just
> simply lack the time to do anything beyond simple maintenance and some
> of the smaller enhancements requested by users. One of my biggest
> things I've been wanting to do it enhance the admin screens for project
> approval and turn that over to this list in the same manner that the
> news and events is currently done. If GBorg is to stay around some
> changes like that would be great to try and involve more people than
> just myself into the process. I could also come up with a list of
> things people have asked for in the past that could be worked on.
>
> If GBorg stays it will need effort and participation from the
> community in order to make it into a better development platform. That
> is not something I can do by my self.
>
> In an effort to fix a mistake I have probably made from the
> beginning I would like to announce that I do not claim control over the
> vision or future of GBorg. I have always tried to do what was desired
> by others in the effort to make GBorg useful to the PostgreSQL
> community. If the pgsql-www group wants to claim control of the vision
> I would encourage it does so.
>
>
> Chris Ryan
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> http://companion.yahoo.com/
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

  • Re: gforge at 2003-12-01 18:26:09 from Chris Ryan

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Ryan 2003-12-01 20:49:11 Re: gforge
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-12-01 19:23:27 Re: gforge