From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'Official' Interfaces |
Date: | 2003-09-25 15:16:34 |
Message-ID: | 20030925121550.W46389@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> > Sent: 25 September 2003 14:23
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Justin Clift; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] 'Official' Interfaces
> >
> >
> >
> > why not a simple "poll" listing the interfaces, and based on
> > votes (ie. # of ppl using that interface), it rises to the
> > top of the lists? Let usage denote "best" ... if it isn't,
> > nobody would be using it, would they?
>
> That's not a bad idea. We could do the same for admin interfaces....
The ability to maybe add comments/reviews to each would be good too ...
that way its not what *we* think is the best, but its what those using it
think ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-09-25 15:18:51 | Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-25 15:07:56 | Re: 'Official' Interfaces |