Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows
Date: 2003-09-25 15:18:51
Message-ID: 87n0csj3qc.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> > Considering this could be a configure time option, you mean to say
> > that even on Unix we could get threaded postgresql which would not
> > require any shared buffers but instead operate upon local shared
> > buffers only?
>
> Only if we were prepared to support multiple, no doubt incompatible
> threading libraries, which is exactly what I wasn't volunteering us for.

Well if you're only going to do one threading API you may as well pick the
POSIX standard. Windows threading is only useful for windows, POSIX threading
would work on every other OS, Solaris, Linux, BSD, etc.

Is there a POSIX threads wrapper for windows?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-09-25 15:21:59 Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes
Previous Message Tim McAuley 2003-09-25 15:12:50 Re: sequence's plpgsql

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2003-09-25 15:53:10 Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-25 15:16:34 Re: 'Official' Interfaces