| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 'Official' Interfaces |
| Date: | 2003-09-25 15:07:56 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B68E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 14:23
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Justin Clift; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] 'Official' Interfaces
>
>
>
> why not a simple "poll" listing the interfaces, and based on
> votes (ie. # of ppl using that interface), it rises to the
> top of the lists? Let usage denote "best" ... if it isn't,
> nobody would be using it, would they?
That's not a bad idea. We could do the same for admin interfaces....
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-25 15:16:34 | Re: 'Official' Interfaces |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-09-25 14:14:50 | Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows |