Re: thread safety

From: Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com>
To: "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: thread safety
Date: 2003-09-02 03:46:24
Message-ID: 200309021346.24151.philip@utiba.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 03:06 am, Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> May be I'm wrong but I'd like know why thread safety was so
> necessary.

It bugged Lee enough that he went and wrote a patch for it. It bugged me
enough that I couldn't use it on our choice of platform (older Linux) that I
did some little fixes for that. I worked on what I needed.

If you need a justification for ECPG threading support: people porting from
Sybase/Informix/Oracle would probably expect ECPG to support threads, and
will get a nasty surprise when their ported application abruptly dies. I
expected it to "just work" and was unpleasantly surprised when it didn't.

Best Regards, Philip Yarra.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug Quale 2003-09-02 04:07:28 Re: About GPL and proprietary software
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-02 03:00:18 Re: thread safety

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-02 03:56:22 Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-02 03:46:17 Re: PG7.5