| From: | "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | thread safety |
| Date: | 2003-09-01 17:06:28 |
| Message-ID: | 004b01c370ab$62c1ea60$32add6c2@mm.eutelsat.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
I seen on this list a lot of energy ( also little flames involving SCO
& Co. ) spent on thread safety;
was really necessary spent so much energy in this direction?
I was at Fosdem in Bruxelles ( I spoke there about the use
of postgres in my project ) and I seen al people there
was really exicited about the anticipation of Bruce Momjian
about the PITR in 7.4 but how we know there was no time for it
May be I'm wrong but I'd like know why thread safety was so
necessary.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lee Kindness | 2003-09-01 17:16:25 | thread safety |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-01 16:29:44 | Re: Logo for PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-09-01 17:07:04 | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-01 17:05:46 | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |