Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Tommi Mäkitalo <t(dot)maekitalo(at)epgmbh(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Date: 2003-09-02 03:56:22
Message-ID: 200309020356.h823uMp20395@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Ouch --- everything is IPv6. Wow, that is unusual. I assumed that
> > folks who have OS's that do that will put IPv6 addresses in pg_hba.conf.
>
> I think that may be reasonable. What bothers me is that the default
> pg_hba.conf will fail to accept localhost connections on such a system.
> OTOH older systems will complain if pg_hba.conf contains IPv6 entries.
>
> We may not have much choice but to find a way to configure pg_hba.conf's
> localhost entries at initdb time ...

Can we allow the IPv6 entries to be in pg_hba.conf but ignore them on
non-IPv6 machines, or allow the connection to fail?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-02 04:04:35 Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)
Previous Message Philip Yarra 2003-09-02 03:46:24 Re: thread safety