| From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Murray Prior Hobbs <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked |
| Date: | 2002-02-04 21:13:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200202042113.g14LDZF01956@saturn.janwieck.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > SPI still needs to learn how to determine if a query uses
> > temp tables somewhere in order to silently re-prepare queries
> > when required. And I am absolutely sure this is not an issue
> > we should address in PL/pgSQL. It has to be solved on the SPI
> > level.
>
> Temp tables are the wrong way to think about it. *Any* invalidation
> of schema data referred to in a query plan should cause replanning.
> We have a TODO item covering this already, don't we?
Of course, still. Nothing changed on that since we discussed
it the last time ;-P
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rudi | 2002-02-05 03:28:12 | Database ownership |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-04 20:50:07 | Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked |