Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Murray Prior Hobbs <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked
Date: 2002-02-04 20:25:55
Message-ID: 11996.1012854355@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> SPI still needs to learn how to determine if a query uses
> temp tables somewhere in order to silently re-prepare queries
> when required. And I am absolutely sure this is not an issue
> we should address in PL/pgSQL. It has to be solved on the SPI
> level.

Temp tables are the wrong way to think about it. *Any* invalidation
of schema data referred to in a query plan should cause replanning.
We have a TODO item covering this already, don't we?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-04 20:27:06 Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-04 20:15:30 Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked