Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Murray Prior Hobbs <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked
Date: 2002-02-04 20:50:07
Message-ID: 200202042050.g14Ko7v12489@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> * Allow row re-use without vacuum (Tom)
>
> > Well, a name doesn't mean someone claimed it but rather the _expert_ on
> > the item. I added this item assuming it was going to be accomplished
> > with some type of auto-vacuum. I will clearify it to mention
> > auto-vacuum, if that is OK.
>
> "Clarify"? How about "replace completely"?
>
> * Provide automatic scheduling of background vacuum
>
> Still not sure that I'd classify it as URGENT.

OK, moved to VACUUM section with your new wording. It used to be urgent
before 7.2. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-02-04 21:13:34 Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-04 20:47:23 Re: temporary tables, plpgsql and yes i bet this has been asked