Re: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Date: 2001-08-14 22:17:23
Message-ID: 200108142217.f7EMHNZ25414@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

> > > I have to fix my old fault in TID handling.
> > > I am able to have a cvs access now and would
> > > commit the fix to 7.1 branch.
> >
> > Hiroshi, are you done with changes you want in 7.1.3?
> >
>
> Oops I missed your mail sorry. Unfortunately my mail server
> is down and I could access pgsql-hackers only by the news server.
>
> My answer is Yes.

OK, 7.1.3 is packaged and ready to go, date stamped Auguest 15. Can
people with cvs 7.1 branches review it?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-14 22:23:07 Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-14 22:02:24 Re: [PATCHES] Makefile.PL for Pg.so

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cedar Cox 2001-08-15 06:37:26 Re: Re: Bug#108286: case sensitivity in column names
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-08-14 18:40:41 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?