Re: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Date: 2001-08-15 09:35:00
Message-ID: 20010815183500Y.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

> OK, 7.1.3 is packaged and ready to go, date stamped Auguest 15. Can
> people with cvs 7.1 branches review it?

Compling/regression tests seems fine on my box (Linux kernel
2.2/egcs-2.91/glic 2.1.3). Documents are also compiled fine.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-08-15 12:07:20 Patches (current CVS) for changes if index AM tables
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-08-15 09:29:30 Re: convert function

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arnaud ESPANEL 2001-08-15 10:16:40 Postgresql 7.1.2 and StarOffice 5.2
Previous Message Cedar Cox 2001-08-15 06:37:26 Re: Re: Bug#108286: case sensitivity in column names