Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

From: Mikhail Terekhov <terekhov(at)emc(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Date: 2001-08-15 13:10:00
Message-ID: 3B7A74A8.82EE601E@emc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Is it possible to include patch for libpgtcl & tcl >8.0
in this release?

Regards,
Mikhail Terekhov

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > > I have to fix my old fault in TID handling.
> > > > I am able to have a cvs access now and would
> > > > commit the fix to 7.1 branch.
> > >
> > > Hiroshi, are you done with changes you want in 7.1.3?
> > >
> >
> > Oops I missed your mail sorry. Unfortunately my mail server
> > is down and I could access pgsql-hackers only by the news server.
> >
> > My answer is Yes.
>
> OK, 7.1.3 is packaged and ready to go, date stamped Auguest 15. Can
> people with cvs 7.1 branches review it?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-08-15 13:14:30 Re: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-08-15 12:54:35 Re: UB-Trees

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-08-15 13:14:30 Re: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Previous Message Arnaud ESPANEL 2001-08-15 11:42:33 Re: Postgresql 7.1.2 and StarOffice 5.2