| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for table which is already removed |
| Date: | 2017-06-06 19:21:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1a9ddc76-2e4b-3b1e-acb4-0774fe21507e@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/3/17 01:04, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:15:50PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/30/17 13:25, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> I think this cause is that the relation status entry could be deleted
>>> by ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH before corresponding table sync worker
>>> starting. Attached patch fixes issues reported on this thread so far.
>>
>> This looks like a reasonable change, but it conflicts with the change
>> discussed on "logical replication - still unstable after all these
>> months". I think I'll deal with that one first.
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. You own
> this open item. Please observe the policy on open item ownership and send a
> status update within three calendar days of this message. Include a date for
> your subsequent status update.
I'm working on this now and will report back tomorrow.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-06-06 19:23:49 | Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-06 19:14:52 | Re: Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags? |