Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>
Cc: 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg
Date: 2017-06-06 19:23:49
Message-ID: 20170606192349.GD32474@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:52:45PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> It seems CREATE AGGREGATE was expanded in 9.6 to support parallelization of
> aggregate functions using transitions, with the addition of serialfunc and
> deserialfunc to the aggregate definitions.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-createaggregate.html
>
> I was looking at the PostgreSQL 10 source code for some example usages of
> this and was hoping that array_agg and string_agg would support the feature.
> At a cursory glance, it seems they do not use this.
> Examples I see that do support it are the average and standard deviation
> functions.
>
> Is there a reason for this or it just wasn't gotten to?

I'd bet on lack of tuits. Anything with text has to deal with
collation issues, etc., that may make this trickier than it first
appears.

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-06-06 19:26:09 Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-06-06 19:21:34 Re: Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for table which is already removed