Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)wizard(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2
Date: 1999-09-01 23:56:06
Message-ID: 199909012356.TAA27517@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)wizard(dot)net> writes:
> > > May I ask that the patches I submitted two months ago for 6.5.0 are applied
> > > at least to 6.5.2?
> > > Here is the 6.5.1 version of my patches.
> >
> > I don't much care for QueryLimit (we got rid of that for a reason!)
> > nor for the FREE_TUPLE_MEMORY patch, but the rest of this looks safe
> > enough... but are we in the business of adding features to 6.5.*,
> > even little ones? Maybe it should only go in current.
>
> 6.5.x is supposed to be *only* fixes, no new features...but I'm curious as
> to why these never got into v6.5.0 in the first place...
>

I applied the safe ones, like the copy.c one. People objected to most
of the others, for reasons I have forgotten.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-01 23:57:18 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-01 23:30:26 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2