Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)wizard(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2
Date: 1999-09-01 23:57:18
Message-ID: 199909012357.TAA27531@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Massimo Dal Zotto <dz(at)wizard(dot)net> writes:
> > > > May I ask that the patches I submitted two months ago for 6.5.0 are applied
> > > > at least to 6.5.2?
> > > > Here is the 6.5.1 version of my patches.
> > >
> > > I don't much care for QueryLimit (we got rid of that for a reason!)
> > > nor for the FREE_TUPLE_MEMORY patch, but the rest of this looks safe
> > > enough... but are we in the business of adding features to 6.5.*,
> > > even little ones? Maybe it should only go in current.
> >
> > 6.5.x is supposed to be *only* fixes, no new features...but I'm curious as
> > to why these never got into v6.5.0 in the first place...
>
> Because they were submitted a few days before the realease date. Bruce told
> me they would go in 6.5.1 but apparently he has forgot them. I hope to see
> them in 6.5.2.
>

Oh, I did? I forgot. Let me try now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-02 00:04:10 Re: [HACKERS] Changes for 6.5.2 ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-01 23:56:06 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2