Re: [HACKERS] please?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] please?
Date: 1999-05-31 20:12:44
Message-ID: 199905312012.QAA01371@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Oracle OCI has oopt() and Informix Online has dirty read that do the trick for
> > > > > > me.
> > > > > > --------
> > > > >
> > > > > Please give me more information. How does dirty read fix the problem?
> > > >
> > > > It allows me to read uncommited records without blocking.
> > >
> > > I suppose it somehow lets you know whether the read was dirty or
> > > clean...
> >
> > Not that I am aware of. Never heard that of Informix.
>
> I also cheat. I use a 3 buffer approach, compare fields and see if a record
> has
> changed before I do an update.

Oh, now we get the full picture. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith Parks 1999-05-31 20:44:24 Re: [HACKERS] please?
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-05-31 20:04:40 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype