Re: 8.4 open items list

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4 open items list
Date: 2009-03-27 04:28:56
Message-ID: 1964.1238128136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think pushing "pre-existing bugs" to 8.5 is a mistake,

> What is the threshold for "has to be fixed before we can go to beta"
> versus "has to be fixed before release"?

I did not by any means intend that those things should wait until 8.5.
The point was that we needn't be ashamed to release an 8.4 *beta*
that has such bugs. Or at least no more than we are ashamed to have
released existing stable versions with 'em.

Beta is about getting a reasonably stable version into the hands of
testers. It's not about achieving perfection before the testers
ever see it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-27 04:56:01 Re: typedefs for indent
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-03-27 03:24:45 Re: 8.4 open items list