Re: dump difference between 9.3 and master after upgrade

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dump difference between 9.3 and master after upgrade
Date: 2013-06-24 19:39:26
Message-ID: 19410.1372102766@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> We probably do need to preserve attribute numbers across an upgrade,
> even for foreign tables. I think those could make their way into
> other places.

Hm ... this argument would also apply to composite types; do we get it
right for those?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-06-24 19:42:18 Re: PLR does not install language templates
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-06-24 19:29:45 Re: backend hangs at immediate shutdown (Re: Back-branch update releases coming in a couple weeks)