From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization |
Date: | 2018-06-29 13:11:37 |
Message-ID: | 1913e082-0d8d-5eb8-c8ca-053af828076a@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/28/2018 06:52 PM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>> I'm afraid that's a misunderstanding - my objections did not really go
>> away. I'm just saying my claim that we're not messing with order of
>> grouping keys is not entirely accurate, because we do that in one
>> particular case.
>>
>> I still think we need to be careful when introducing new optimizations
>> in this area - reordering the grouping keys by ndistinct, ORDER BY or
>> whatever. In particular I don't think we should commit these patches
>> that may quite easily cause regressions, and then hope some hypothetical
>> future patch fixes the costing. Those objections still stand.
>
> Pls, have a look at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/18/1706/
> I tried to attack the cost_sort() issues and hope on that basis we can
> solve problems with 0002 patch and improve incremental sort patch.
>
OK, will do. Thanks for working on this!
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-06-29 13:20:02 | Re: Code of Conduct committee: call for volunteers |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-06-29 13:05:32 | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |