Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response
Date: 1999-11-30 02:30:58
Message-ID: 18913.943929058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>>> No nested CASE's?
>>
>> Looks like not. I would guess that it is fairly straightforward to
>> fix, but am not sure. Tom Lane hunted down an killed most of the CASE
>> problems (thanks Tom!), and this is in an area he is working on now.
>> Maybe you can get him to look at it??

> Is this an item for the TODO list?

Fixed in current sources, I believe.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-11-30 02:34:48 Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-11-30 02:28:49 Re: [HACKERS] Bug