| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response |
| Date: | 1999-12-01 00:27:30 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.20.9912010126370.382-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1999-11-29, Tom Lane mentioned:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >>>> No nested CASE's?
> >>
> >> Looks like not. I would guess that it is fairly straightforward to
> >> fix, but am not sure. Tom Lane hunted down an killed most of the CASE
> >> problems (thanks Tom!), and this is in an area he is working on now.
> >> Maybe you can get him to look at it??
>
> > Is this an item for the TODO list?
>
> Fixed in current sources, I believe.
The problem (I sent it in) was actually no sub-selects in target list.
Nested cases work fine I believe.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 1999-12-01 02:29:04 | Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu>] (fwd)) |
| Previous Message | Ian Macdonald | 1999-12-01 00:03:57 | Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu>] (fwd)) |