From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory |
Date: | 2017-05-29 21:12:51 |
Message-ID: | 1791.1496092371@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Agreed. Shouldn't this be back-patched? PG_CONTROL_VERSION has not
> been bumped between 9.4 and 9.5. Attached is a patch for HEAD.
Pushed with minor adjustments. Notably, I didn't take your addition
of canonicalize_path() and referencing the file by absolute path.
That seems like an independent and rather debatable behavioral change.
All the other files that pg_resetwal touches are referenced with
relative paths; if we did want to change the reporting, shouldn't we
change it for all of them?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-29 21:15:11 | Re: [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-05-29 21:06:49 | Re: [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message. |