From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |
Date: | 2025-08-17 13:57:50 |
Message-ID: | 164575.1755439070@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> On 15.08.25 19:30, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> Clearly, there are more ways to contribute, and the term "Contributor"
>> on the curated list should probably be more specific.
> The threshold for getting into the release notes is absolutely minimal,
> and I think it would devalue the curation work that you are doing by
> somehow combining the two data sets or making a third level based on the
> release notes or something like that.
+1. For example, a single bug report is enough to get you into the
commit log and thence the release notes. There's no requirement for
continuing effort, but I think even the lowest level of the curated
list should imply some amount of that.
Perhaps the release notes could be useful as a sanity check though.
Say, if a person appears in the last three release-note lists and
is not in the curated list, maybe that is a name to take another
look at.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2025-08-17 14:32:46 | Remove "employer" from Past Major Contributor profile |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-08-17 12:06:22 | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |