| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |
| Date: | 2025-08-18 01:10:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvoGrxQYD7jBG2pK8R2C2Q55ez0WB1XL+3m3_TcSxKZjrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 at 01:58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Perhaps the release notes could be useful as a sanity check though.
> Say, if a person appears in the last three release-note lists and
> is not in the curated list, maybe that is a name to take another
> look at.
I think now that committers are using a more consistent format in the
commit messages that includes email addresses, it should be easier to
script up that sort of thing. e.g. HAVING MAX(commit_timestamp) -
MIN(commit_timestamp) > INTERVAL 'N years' AND count(*) > M. Perhaps
it'd still need a manual review process, but something like that might
stop people falling through the cracks and being forgotten.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan Abdiel Gonzalez Valdebenito | 2025-08-18 12:18:40 | Support for listing the beta versions |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2025-08-18 01:04:02 | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |