| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |
| Date: | 2025-08-17 12:06:22 |
| Message-ID: | 4a98007e-2103-42f9-afef-fd75095239a1@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 15.08.25 19:30, Christoph Berg wrote:
> You are a "Contributor" when you appear on this list.
>
> But we also have long lists of "individuals [who] have contributed" in
> the release notes:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/release-17.html#RELEASE-17-
> ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
>
> You are a contributor when you contributed to the release.
>
> Clearly, there are more ways to contribute, and the term "Contributor"
> on the curated list should probably be more specific.
The threshold for getting into the release notes is absolutely minimal,
and I think it would devalue the curation work that you are doing by
somehow combining the two data sets or making a third level based on the
release notes or something like that.
Personally, I think it's all fine as it is. Maybe an additional
adjective in front of "Contributor", but it's not a big deal IMO.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-08-17 13:57:50 | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-08-16 20:02:28 | Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels |