| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Increase value of OUTER_VAR |
| Date: | 2021-03-06 14:59:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1555226.1615042755@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 04.03.21 20:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (2) Does that datatype change need to propagate anywhere besides
>> what I touched here? I did not make any effort to search for
>> other places.
> I think
> Var.varnosyn
> CurrentOfExpr.cvarno
> should also have their type changed.
Agreed as to CurrentOfExpr.cvarno. But I think the entire point of
varnosyn is that it saves the original rangetable reference and
*doesn't* get overwritten with OUTER_VAR etc. So that one is a
different animal, and I'm inclined to leave it as Index.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-06 15:08:55 | Re: Inquiries about PostgreSQL's system catalog development——from a student developer of Nanjing University |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-03-06 14:21:35 | Re: is cfbot's apply aging intentional? |