| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Increase value of OUTER_VAR |
| Date: | 2021-04-07 13:35:56 |
| Message-ID: | 97563e37-3011-67d7-e816-e7f899311c54@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.03.21 15:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 04.03.21 20:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> (2) Does that datatype change need to propagate anywhere besides
>>> what I touched here? I did not make any effort to search for
>>> other places.
>
>> I think
>
>> Var.varnosyn
>> CurrentOfExpr.cvarno
>
>> should also have their type changed.
>
> Agreed as to CurrentOfExpr.cvarno. But I think the entire point of
> varnosyn is that it saves the original rangetable reference and
> *doesn't* get overwritten with OUTER_VAR etc. So that one is a
> different animal, and I'm inclined to leave it as Index.
Can we move forward with this?
I suppose there was still some uncertainty about whether all the places
that need changing have been identified, but do we have a better idea
how to find them?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-04-07 13:40:37 | Re: Increase value of OUTER_VAR |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-04-07 13:32:55 | Re: SSL SNI |