| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aditya Kamath <Aditya(dot)Kamath1(at)ibm(dot)com>, Srirama Kucherlapati <sriram(dot)rk(at)in(dot)ibm(dot)com>, "peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org" <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "tristan(at)partin(dot)io" <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, "postgres-ibm-aix(at)wwpdl(dot)vnet(dot)ibm(dot)com" <postgres-ibm-aix(at)wwpdl(dot)vnet(dot)ibm(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: AIX support |
| Date: | 2026-01-29 23:48:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1501929.1769730517@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Should any of these be backpatched, actually? Based on the lack of
> complaints, it does not seem so to me, but if we are targetting a
> backpatch of the AIX port, that would be required.
There's no plan to backpatch the AIX port ... but if we can clean
up this include-path mess not too invasively, I think it might be
a good idea to back-patch that much. I'm concerned that confusion
between <float.h> and utils/float.h might be a problem on other
platforms too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2026-01-29 23:51:26 | Re: unnecessary executor overheads around seqscans |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-01-29 23:44:09 | Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful? |