Re: unnecessary executor overheads around seqscans

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: unnecessary executor overheads around seqscans
Date: 2026-01-29 23:51:26
Message-ID: 2eb6ppzfjfk6lawdkpgs2soruihn3lwcliau4oqokc4ykmiilf@244dmhag5hji
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I've edited the patch a bit more and pushed it:

- I ended up not liking _impl() that much, and changed it to common. That
seems more in line what it actually does.

- All the beginscan functions are called beginscan, so I renamed
table_scan_begin_impl to match

- We normally don't use function names in error message strings. I've
rephrased the error

- Some comment rephrasing

Greetings,

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Borisov 2026-01-30 00:04:33 Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-01-29 23:48:37 Re: AIX support