Re: 2021-11-11 release announcement draft

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-11-11 release announcement draft
Date: 2021-11-10 19:37:03
Message-ID: 1456437.1636573023@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On 11/9/21 10:39 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Please add something like:
>> * Fix REINDEX CONCURRENTLY to preserve operator class parameters that were
>> attached to the target index

> Happy to be convinced otherwise (maybe this is used more than I
> realize?), but I'm not sure if we need that bullet point in the release
> announcement.

FWIW, I agree with Jonathan's choice here. Opclass parameters are a
very tiny minority use-case as of today. (Were they not, we'd probably
have found this bug sooner.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-11-10 19:45:23 Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2021-11-10 19:25:56 Re: emit recovery stats via a new file or a new hook