Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto
Date: 2021-11-10 19:45:23
Message-ID: 948A2283-CB36-4CC6-AE29-2D3CF1FBB90C@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/28/21, 5:42 AM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks all for reviewing this. Here's the CF entry -
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/35/3378/

I've marked this one as ready-for-committer.

Nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-11-10 20:00:02 Re: Deduplicate code updating ControleFile's DBState.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-10 19:37:03 Re: 2021-11-11 release announcement draft