Re: pglz performance

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gasper Zejn <zejn(at)owca(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pglz performance
Date: 2019-11-25 08:21:27
Message-ID: 13C6049A-C3D9-4021-9934-41488DE38BE9@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 25 нояб. 2019 г., в 13:03, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> написал(а):
>
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 09:04:25AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> OK, waiting on some independent verification of benchmark numbers.
>
> Still waiting for these after 19 days, so the patch has been marked as
> returned with feedback.

I think status Needs Review describes what is going on better. It's not like something is awaited from my side.

Thanks.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-25 08:29:40 Re: pglz performance
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-25 08:13:07 Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption