Re: pglz performance

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Gasper Zejn <zejn(at)owca(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pglz performance
Date: 2019-11-25 08:03:09
Message-ID: 20191125080309.GK99720@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 09:04:25AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> OK, waiting on some independent verification of benchmark numbers.

Still waiting for these after 19 days, so the patch has been marked as
returned with feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-25 08:05:12 Re: log bind parameter values on error
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-25 08:01:33 Re: Avoiding deadlock errors in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY