Re: pglz performance

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gasper Zejn <zejn(at)owca(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pglz performance
Date: 2019-11-25 08:29:40
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 01:21:27PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> I think status Needs Review describes what is going on better. It's
> not like something is awaited from my side.

Indeed. You are right so I have moved the patch instead, with "Needs
review". The patch status was actually incorrect in the CF app, as it
was marked as waiting on author.

@Tomas: updated versions of the patches have been sent by Andrey.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-25 08:33:35 Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2019-11-25 08:21:27 Re: pglz performance