Re: Caught up

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Caught up
Date: 2012-09-24 14:22:48
Message-ID: 1348496481-sup-5499@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of sáb sep 22 14:58:04 -0300 2012:
> On 3 September 2012 15:20, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> > On a related note, I apologize that many of these items didn't make it
> > into 9.2, though they are committed for 9.3. The good news is that most
> > of my work was in documentation improvements and clarifications, that
> > could be backpatched to 9.2. I did not bring this up earlier because I
> > didn't want to distract the work of making the improvements.
> >
> > If anyone wants to look at backpatching some of these doc changes into
> > 9.2, I will not object. ;-) I am attaching a partial list of doc
> > changes that might be considered. (I need to improve my commit messages
> > that reference earlier commits by including the old commit tag; my
> > apologies.) No one has mentioned backpatching so perhaps these are all
> > too minor, which is fine.
>
> That's a huge number of amendments. Thanks for giving these some
> attention Bruce.

FWIW I tried to backpatch the changes listed by Bruce and they all seem
to apply fine to 9.2 so maybe we should do that -- I see no reason not
to.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-24 14:24:56 Re: Configuration include directory
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-09-24 14:17:53 Re: pg_reorg in core?