Re: pg_reorg in core?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date: 2012-09-24 14:17:53
Message-ID: 1348496245-sup-7051@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Daniele Varrazzo's message of dom sep 23 22:02:51 -0300 2012:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > As proposed by Masahiko, a single organization grouping all the tools (one
> > repository per tool) would be enough. Please note that github can also host
> > documentation. Bug tracker would be tool-dedicated in this case.
>
> From this PoV, pgFoundry allows your tool to be under
> http://yourtool.projects.postgresql.org instead of under a more
> generic namespace: I find it a nice and cozy place in the url space
> where to put your project. If pgFoundry will be dismissed I hope at
> least a hosting service for static pages will remain.

I don't think that has been offered.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-09-24 14:22:48 Re: Caught up
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-24 14:13:45 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed